FURTHER proof that Brexit is already damaging important parts of the British economy came yesterday with the news that the majority of architects across the UK have had building work delayed or even cancelled due to the referendum result in 2016.
The information emerged yesterday when the Royal Institute of British Architects (Riba) issued its latest Global Designs report, which contains “a stark Brexit warning from architects across the UK.”
READ MORE: MSPs vote to save Holyrood from Tory Brexit power grab
The institute added: “With one year to go until we leave the European Union, the report makes an urgent call for the UK Government to ensure that the UK’s architecture sector can continue to be globally successful.”
In the survey which formed part of the report, more than two-thirds of UK architects reported that building projects had been put on hold since the referendum.
More than a third said they had projects cancelled in 2017 because of the uncertainty of Brexit. Now Riba’s members are demanding a proper trade and professional recognition deal that enables them to stay in the single market and employ European talent.
READ MORE: ‘Little Britain’ fishermen didn’t heed our Brexit warnings so Tories seized their chance
The report states that 74 per cent of UK architects want “frictionless access” to the European single market and say that is a priority for expanding international work.
More than 20 per cent of the 40,000 architects working in the UK are from the EU, and the survey found 60 per cent of EU architects have considered leaving – a big rise since a similar survey in 2016, when 40 per cent said they had considered leaving because of Brexit.
Riba chief executive Alan Vallance said: “Many EU architects continue to face uncertainty about their future in the UK. This is unsustainable.
“It is having a real-time impact on recruitment and is unquestionably a threat to the success of our economy and society. The UK Government must make urgent decisions that allow the sector to thrive today.”
Riba President Ben Derbyshire said: “2018 is a critical year for UK architecture. We need urgent action from the government if we are to stem the talent exodus and inspire confidence.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here